Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian political parties in Ukraine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  16:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Russian political parties in Ukraine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

POV listing. Several of these parties are multicultural. The fact that some parties support cooperation with Russia does not make them 'Russian parties' Soman (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. OK, but other are clearly Russians. All of the parties promote Russian culture. Besides, your opinion of them being multicultural for whatever reason does not prove that they are not Russian in their ideology. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 06:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * keep but rename to Russophile or Pro-Russia pol parties --Львівське (говорити) 22:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * That would actually be even more POVish. --Soman (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sorry, but I don't see any way that this article can be kept. At best, I believe that this information can be included somewhere, particularly in Russians in Ukraine (potential section heading of #Politics/Political parties), or Russophilia. But I don't see a use for having a separate article on this topic.  Facebook like thumb.png DDima 04:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I could see this article being worthy of keeping, but it would need to have much more than just one list and one reference. Orser67 (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The information can be salvaged but the list is inherently POVed - there is no clear criteria for the inclusion to the inclusion to it is quite loaded Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.