Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian pornography and erotica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Russian pornography and erotica

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is written as a personal essay and offers no real insight to the topic. It should be deleted and recreated by someone else who is interested and able to write the article. Belasted (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, I think the topic is covered in Pornography. So this article shouldn't even be rewritten. I would say some of its content could be added to the porno article, but there's not really anything worth adding. Belasted (talk) 02:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Merge with Pornography or Erotica. Letsdrinktea (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- Cerejota (talk) 08:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  -- Cerejota (talk) 08:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, weakly, and would also suggest a move to Pornography in Russia. The topic seems worthy; the tone, fixable by editing.  Much in the current content would turn on whether the Hot Specialty website constitutes a reliable source; but any website that calls itself "A Treasury of Erotic Smut" in its header graphic is too endearing to be unreliable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Note also the standalone article Pornography in the Soviet Union and the long list of Pornography by region. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, I am, right now. Belasted (talk) 04:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough specilized material to justify an artcle DGG (talk) 09:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC).,


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.