Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustam Serbiev


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:33, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Rustam Serbiev

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMMA. The only coverage I could find on him is based on the fact he knows Khabib Nurmagomedov. 2 . O . Boxing 00:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  00:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  00:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  2 . O . Boxing  00:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Some minor coverage in Belgian newspapers, but all interviews or articles with an interview element, and always framed as him being someone who knows Nurmagomedov. Only had one professional fight, hosted by minor promotion. Not nearly enough to be notable. Ealuscerwen (talk) 02:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Here are some articles about him, with significant coverage. None of them are based on the fact that he knows Khabib Nurmagomedov. Khabib obviously does get mentioned in the articles since he is the world champion and they train together. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rustamserbiev (talk • contribs) 04:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC) — Rustamserbiev (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Papaursa (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject has one professional MMA fight for a minor organization. The record in the article is based on amateur fights which should never be combined with pro fights.  He clearly fails to meet WP:NMMA and interviews and proposed sources are not sufficent to make a case for meeting WP:GNG.  Article creator is an SPA and may have a COI. Papaursa (talk) 02:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.