Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustlers (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 05:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Rustlers (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted because, as I said before it has got too little information, too little notability, too little neutrality. A movie would have more info if it was notable. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Alt title:
 * Italian:
 * Yugoslavia:(
 * Alt title:
 * Italian:
 * Yugoslavia:(
 * Alt title:
 * Italian:
 * Yugoslavia:(


 * Keep per being sourcable as an early film in the careers of John Ford, Pete Morrison, Helen Gibson, and Hoot Gibson and being an important part in the career of the individuals involved, as well as being part of American cinematic history. To the nom, we do not delete articles for being stubby. A 95-year-old silent film will not remain in the headlines, will likely have been screened multiple times more-than-5-years after initial release, and will likely have been part of retrospectives. We best serve the project by using common sense and some diligence to look to WP:NF and determine how they might be improved through regular editing.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Schmidt and per WP:COMMONSENSE. Cavarrone 06:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Taking into account the age of the film along with the article's current references (and the potential for others, such as those listed in the Levy ref - p.75), this looks in my view to be a reasonable enough stub.  Gong   show  07:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per the excellent expansion work done by Michael. John Ford was one of the most notable film directors of all time, and it's crazy to suggest that this film simply isn't notable. I'm interested what the nom means by "too little neutrality" in their arguement for deletion though.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 07:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Me too... specially as the sourced nominated version was neutral in the extreme. It may simply be his inexperience, something only time will address.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per & .  Given the importance of John Ford, I can't see how deleting this could possibly improve the encyclopedia. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.