Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rusty buckets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Qualifies for speedy deletion (A7), quite apart from the fact that there is clear consensus here. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Rusty buckets

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article does not appear to be about a notable subject.  Gourami Watcher   (Gulp) 21:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable dog. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm unable to pull up the article in the reference. Regardless, I can find no other coverage assuming that one in the article is significant.  That's insufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  09:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Even the one citation they provided doesn't seem to exist. I believe this is a hoax (dog probably exists, but I doubt there's much coverage of his burglar-catching prowess...) (posted by JoelWhy)
 * Delete in the absence of better coverage. Probably catches cat burglars. Peridon (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.