Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth 3,000 Years of Sleeping Prophecy Awakened


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete per COI and non-notability..  bibliomaniac 1 5  A straw poll on straw polls 05:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Ruth 3,000 Years of Sleeping Prophecy Awakened

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

An article about a self-published book with no assertion of notability, written by the book's author. Amazon number is below 2,000,000. I originally tagged it as db-spam/contested, but reconsidered, and have moved it here.  Acroterion  (talk)  22:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:COI, etc. Non-notable, no sources, clearly autobiographical. GlassCobra 22:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because self-publishing (via Xulon Press, a "Christian self-publisher") does not confer any notability and there are no sources (I found no third-party comments in a brief search). Accounting4Taste 22:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. COI, non notable.  No prejudice to recreation if the subject of the article does become notable. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. JJL 23:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be a writer trying to promote their own book...User: (talk • contribs • count ) 23:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, non-notable article. No assertion of notability is present in the article. —  Wen li  (reply here) 01:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable, self-published book. No ghits that discuss the book in a non-trivial way. -- B figura  (talk) 01:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and WP:COI. Stifle (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.