Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Atkins (UK nurse)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Dennis - 2&cent; 21:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Ruth Atkins (UK nurse)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The first British woman to receive an experimental vaccine already being tested in other human subjects. This is a WP:BIO1E. She is already covered in cAd3-ZEBOV. Xqxf (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete/redirect to cAd3-ZEBOV - Marginally notable for one unfortunate event. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 16:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note This article has a previous history at NIAID/GSK ebolavirus vaccine (originally Ruth Atkins), which was eventually redirected to cAd3-ZEBOV (I didn't realize that article existed when I was making my confusing set of moves.) Thus a full AfD, though I don't think this changes anything. Xqxf (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. per nom. Clearly a WP:BLP1E. Article doesn't even try to assert her notability outside the vaccine and it would likely be impossible to do so in any case. Cannolis (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clear WP:BLP1E. EricSerge (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, any vaccine information belongs elsewhere. Basie (talk) 01:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:BLP1E and to me, this article is an invasion of privacy. For a similar situation please see Articles for deletion/William Pooley (Ebola patient). I am starting to worry over how many of these there are. Jytdog (talk) 07:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Gah, we sound like the Telegraph or Sun. We are not a tabloid.  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, bio of person who did not die of Ebola. Abductive  (reasoning) 15:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as BLP1E; if we can't delete, then Redirect to a notable subject. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E, or simply redirect to cAd3-ZEBOV. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 10:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E although there's much coverage.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that WP:BLP1E implies that Wikipedia should not include this article. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  09:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; also fails WP:42: despite the broadness of coverage, it appears to be shallow. Bearian (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and everyone above. Is it snowing yet? SW3 5DL (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:BLP1E, then redirect to cAd3-ZEBOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:16, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.