Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Mountaingrove


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 14:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Ruth Mountaingrove

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This figure is not notable, less than 30 google news results, and she established a very small magazine that has little to no coverage or attention to this day. Her land trust was 147 acres. To put that into context, the Appalachian Trail Conservancy an actually notable land trust has 250,000 acres. ShimonChai (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: The related journal WomanSpirit is also up for deletion here --Theredproject (talk) 19:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: it seems worth noting that her papers are in the archives of a major university and her NPR affiliate did not one, but two 30m shows to her memory   and the local paper published an obituary  --Theredproject (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's typical for the local paper publish an obituary for people who have little to know notability, it means nothing in terms of notability. ShimonChai (talk) 19:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steve Smith (talk) 03:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. A paid obituary does not establish notability. An article about the subject written by a staff writer of the newspaper does establish notability. Moreover, the radio broadcasts also establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep has substantial coverage in reliable sources such as a women's bio encyclopedia published by the respected academic publisher Routledge as well as other rs books and press, passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * plus add that to have ones papers considered important enough to be included as part of a major university (U of Oregon) collection is no small accomplishment. A clear keep. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The entry for Moutaingrove in Feminists Who Changed America is a clear example of analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources (the archive referred to above). Vexations (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Vexations and Atlantic306. /Julle (talk) 10:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.