Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Easily fails WP:ACADEMIC, Open-and-shut case, if not quite a speedy. She needs to write a book or give some interviews or get an award or something if she wants an article. Herostratus (talk) 02:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Name spelt wrong. "Ruth Pat-Horenczyk" gives some hits. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC).
 * Argh, can't they get their names right at least. You are correct, "Ruth Pat-Horenczyk" generates more hits (although "Ruth Pat-Horenzcyk" also generates hits, which is confusing). However, I still don't see the kind of hits - to books, interviews, important papers, keynote speeches, etc. - to convey notability in a WP:PROF sense. Herostratus (talk) 03:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * GS hits give h index of 8, so probably not quite enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC).


 * Delete. Having checked both spellings of surname in Google News, Books & Scholar, I don't think this person meets any of the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC as yet. Qwfp (talk) 08:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.