Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Ulrich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. PeaceNT 08:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Ruth Ulrich

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN as an unelected local politician, substitute local broadcaster Toddst1 22:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Might justify a page if she wins as she will then be an elected public figure, otherwise Delete. The page will need a bit of rewrite if it is kept.Alberon 10:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete' - does not meet WP:BIO unelected politician. -- Whpq 16:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as things stand but without prejudice to recreation if she wins the election. At the moment there doesn't seem to be enough to distinguish her from any other candidate for office (of which there are a lot). The radio career doesn't seem significant enough (no coverage in RS's that I can see) to warrant inclusion on those grounds. —  iride  scent  16:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule Category:[^\]]*politic 50 points Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule conservative 10 points
 * Keep The bot scores this story 145 points, far more than other stories that are not being challenged. She easily qualifies whether she wins the general election or not.

Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule democra(t|c) 10 points

Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule democratic\sparty 10 points Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule election 10 points

Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule politician 25 points Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule regulation 10 points

Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule republican 10 points

Article Ruth Ulrich matched rule republican\sparty 10 points Total 145 points

Now note this:Article Dave Begg matched rule alumn 10 points Article Dave Begg matched rule universit 10 points

Article Dave Begg matched rule category:[^\]]*universit 20 points

Total 40 points

No one is suggesting removing Dave Begg, and he scored 105 points lower than Ulrich.

In addition, there are 42 references to Ulrich on Google, but some are repeats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billy Hathorn (talk • contribs) 03:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Billy Hathorn 23:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * WTF? —  iride  scent  18:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for sure.  42 Ghits neither proves or disproves the notability of a living person, but it probably leans against her notability. Bearian&#39;sBooties 19:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot/PoliticsLog This is the bot that gives her 145 points.

There are 50 references to Ulrich on Yahoo search engine in the first 13 blocks. Billy Hathorn 19:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - The bot scores an article to provide some automation in categorizing articles and evaluating whether it looks like a politics related article to be included in the list of new articles for WP:PLT. It doesn't establish notability. -- Whpq 20:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

One more thing. I think Ulrich would be recognized by 300,000 to 500,000 people, or whatever is the average weekly audience of the Griffon radio program. Anyone who listens semi-regularly would know who she it.

Billy Hathorn 20:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nominator is correct, unelected and thus with few if any ongoing sources. Guy (Help!) 20:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if she were to win the election, the election is for members on the State School Board, not the legislature. We have never considered state school boards as sufficient for notability. DGG (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.