Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth dewittbukater

Ruth dewittbukater was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

This person seems to be of no historical significance whatsoever and may not have actually existed. May be a relative of the anonymous editor who wrote this. See also Rose Dawson (above)AndyL 05:31, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Nonsense loosely derived from the Titanic movie. It could probably be speedy deleted. RickK 05:33, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * This is the third piece of garbage today, starting with a bogus article about some ship. Speedy delete both articles and block user. -
 * Delete - Ocon | Talk 05:46, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * I think it's supposed to be Rose DeWitt Buchater anyway.... Hornyvaughany 12:16, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)