Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rutvik Oza (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 03:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Rutvik Oza
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Since an article on this individual was previously deleted and salted, since editors at its recent RM expressed that this one should be too, and since it was recently PRODded (which I guess shouldn't've happened), I am opening discussion on the topic. This is a procedural nomination; I am neutral, at least for now. BDD (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep This article is NOT about the individual, whose article was previously deleted. That person was a namesake 19-year mathematician. This person fulfills WP:ANYBIO as it has won a notable Filmfare award and has worked on many notable Bollywood films. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 09:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep First AfD nomination of the title was not really about this person, that was about some non-notable person. The present article is about a Bollywood director who has been nominated for three notable awards and won one of them. And, yes, this way he meets ANYBIO, and the article should be kept. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  10:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep As the others say, the first AfD is completely irrelevant, having concerned a different individual. This person is an award-winning screenwriter, meeting the standards of WP:GNG. Xoloz (talk) 02:53, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.