Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruxandra Colan-Petcu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 06:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Ruxandra Colan-Petcu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

None of the WP:ARTIST criteria are met here, and there are no independent sources confirming notability. The first footnote refers to a pamphlet presented by a genealogical hobbyist, and is hardly relevant. Same with the second, which is a personal website. The third appears a dead link, but in any case, if all it confirmed is that she's on the staff at a college, that doesn't bring us very far in establishing notability. Like many of the crufty articles on the Filotti family that we have already gotten rid of (Traian Filotti, Mircea Filotti, Ion Gr. Oprişan, etc), this too should be deleted. - Biruitorul Talk 01:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete partly in agreement with Biruitorul's well-formed argument, and partly because all I could find in a long Google search was circular links to WP mirrors and piggyback sites such as this (Who knew that "nervous energy may have caused Ruxandra to bite his nails"?) . ClaretAsh (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Not just because I don't like being made to read about numerology (numerologists beware!), but also because, as Biruitorul notes, there is not one decent source, independent of the subject, to be found on this lady. Dahn (talk) 23:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.