Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Bennett (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 13:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Ryan Bennett (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable hockey player who fails WP:NHOCKEY. No Evidence he passes WP:GNG. Coycan (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 30.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 16:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks significant coverage and fails WP:GNG. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Satisfies WP:NHOCKEY, has played 399 professional top level minor league games, requirement is 200. XeroxKleenex (talk) 05:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * XeroxKleenex, where are you getting the 399 number from? I only count 12 AHL games that would go toward the 200 game requirement. The other leagues do not satisfy this criteria per WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Tchaliburton (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Minor league player who does not pass notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete After some google searching he does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Only substantive article I could find was . RonSigPi (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.