Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Edwards (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Ryan Edwards (footballer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 04:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 04:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:01, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - reserve team player who has not played at top senior level, thus failing guidelines mentioned above. C 679 21:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete and recreate if he makes his debut. As a player he is progressing in the right direction, I don't think it will be far off when he passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Govvy (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fail WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. No prejudice against recreation once one of the criteria is met. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails all yardsticks. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 22:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. — sparklism  hey! 10:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete As clear cut as these come really, hasn't been near Reading's first team, and has no loan spells. SCIAG (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Snow delete nomination is solid against my WP:BEFORE check. Mkdw talk 08:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.