Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Hamilton Zehl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Ryan Hamilton Zehl

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article doesn't meet WP:BIO requirements. Also see WP:SOAPBOX - Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 01:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. - Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 01:40, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete lawyer does law stuff. Nothing notable about what he does. No sources found. Might be a story about the young woman who's photo was used without permission, but that's a stretch. He's not the subject of the those articles and is mentioned in passing. Oaktree b (talk) 01:59, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, nothing of encyclopedic note here. BD2412  T 04:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Article Do meet the requirement as it says in the first paragraph of  WP:BIO   "the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" Ryan's work is remarkable he won such cases which made the record. ~ BuxyNanny BuxyNanny (talk) 23:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: No notable coverage. Gusfriend (talk) 07:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. A list of cases won is not an encyclopedia article. No evidence of notability and nothing to justify a WP:BLP. -- Kinu t/c 07:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.