Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Hampton (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Ryan Hampton (writer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nominated by with the following rationale (see request):

This is a procedural nomination; I am neutral. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Just from a quick glance for some sources, I'm finding plenty that cover his life and activities spanning years in multiple forms of publications, including the adaptation of one of his books into a TV series.
 * Former Clinton aide shares story to help people struggling with addiction
 * Advocates seek a say
 * After speech, Obama's words echo
 * No More About Us Without Us: A Conversation with Ryan Hampton
 * Inside the opioid addiction crisis with ‘American Fix’ author Ryan Hampton
 * Out of a fix: Former addict, author visits county jail
 * Stone Village Television to Adapt Ryan Hampton’s ‘Unsettled’ as Limited Series
 * And that was just from a quick database search and Google search. So there's likely more to find for anyone who wants to dig deeper. Silver  seren C 06:40, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Politics, California, Florida,  and Virginia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  11:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep sources are not entirely about the subject, but they have enough coverage to just get it over the notability "edge". Oaktree b (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ones given above are ok, I'd rather these than what's used in the article to be honest. Oaktree b (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: Sources listed in this discussion suffice. Please update the article accordingly. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:38, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Well-published notable author and noted activist. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.