Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Moye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Ryan Moye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local TV journalist. Sole provided reference was subject's profile on employer's web site. No better sources found. Looks speediable to me, but an A7 nomination was declined. -- Finngall  talk  18:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a clear A7 speedy delete to me as well. We don't have articles on every single news reporter and I don't think he meets our GNG guidelines. Liz  Read! Talk! 18:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:A7. As the nominator (and as the original speedy nominator), this article seems to fall completely within speedy guidelines. I disagree with the user who declined the speedy, asserting that the article contains a claim of significance. However, the article clearly does not pass Credible claim of significance, particularly the portion which reads "assuming this were true, would this (or something that 'this' might plausibly imply) cause a person to be notable?" Although the article does claim the subject is the recipient of an award, WP:ANYBIO requires that an award be "well-known and significant." This award is issued by a fairly small organization, Society of Professional Journalists. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   19:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I see 2 claims of significance; the award, and reporting for the notable TV channel. The organisation that issues the award might be small, but it appears to be notable, and that's what matters. Size and notability do not necessarily correlate with each other. Adam9007 (talk) 19:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per A7, not notable, no sources. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 22:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I myself would tag it but it may be removed because of the listed award, still not questionable for any necessary improvements yet. SwisterTwister   talk  05:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.