Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan O'Hara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Ryan O'Hara
The result was Keep. Non vandlised version is not a hoax and passes WP:BIOExtraDry 13:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a hoax. Jauerback 23:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The current article is not a hoax. Jauerback 13:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Obviously the current bio is a hoax, however if you look at the original version of the page, he's still not notable. Fails WP:BIO.  Jauerback 23:36, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Isn't he a rugby player... Lemon flash talk  23:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The current bio is a hoax, but the original person isn't notable. Bart133 (t) (c) 23:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have reverted the vandalism to the previous version of the article. Contributors to this AFD should look at the version of the article that discusses the Australian rugby league player, and not the vandalized version that claims the subject is an “American race car driver, actor and director.” &#9679;DanMS • Talk 01:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * LOL. There are three different "versions" of this article?  Well, if the current version is real, then I change my vote to Keep. Jauerback 01:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep the article on the league player under WP:BIO. He is a professional sports person as per this article. . Capitalistroadster 02:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 02:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep fulfils WP:BIO as a professional sportsperson Recurring dreams 05:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep not a hoax, meets WP:BIO, what's the problem? -- Mattinbgn/talk 12:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If had you read through all the comments and checked the history of the page, when it was nominated, the current page displayed was a hoax. The original page created (assuming there is more than one Ryan O'Hara) was about a child comedian did not meet WP:BIO.  A few revisions in between, the current page was done about the current rugby player who DOES meet WP:BIO.  Jauerback 13:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for assuming I hadn't read the comments or the article history. Again, I ask, given that the current article meets WP:BIO and is not a hoax, is there any reason why it should not be kept? -- Mattinbgn/talk 00:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.