Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Persaud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Ryan Persaud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable cricketer, has not played cricket at a level that satisfies WP:CRIN, with the previous PROD being removed because he plays for Atlantic Region, which doesn't play cricket at FC/LA/T20 level. StickyWicket (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable cricket player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment cannot recommend delete or keep at this point. Seems the article creator needs more time possibly make the article meaningful/notable.  Dharp86  Dharp86 12:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. How on earth can he manage that, unless he arranges his own first-class, List A or Twenty20 competition for Persaud to play in? StickyWicket (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * - The Jamaica Tallawahs are playing in the first semi-final of the 2020 CPL as I type. Persaud was not in the starting XI, and unless they win this match to progress to the final (very unlikely) AND he plays in that match, he won't meet the notability requirements. At least not until he actually plays in a match.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 14:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The presumption of notability based on one match (or even a few matches) that is offered by NCRIC/CRIN has been debunked. If the required sources to meet GNG/BIO/SPORTBASIC do not exist now, even if he had played today, without a truly spectacular/match-winning contribution it's highly unlikely that the sources would arise tomorrow. wjematherplease leave a message... 15:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Strange, must have missed that discussion on the project page... StickyWicket (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * For those who truly may have missed something, there have been many discussions at WT:CRIC (including this current one in which you have commented), many recent AfDs (e.g. this & this, in which you have contributed) and this current discussion at WT:NSPORT (which you have also commented in). wjematherplease leave a message... 19:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * “The presumption of notability based on one match (or even a few matches) that is offered by NCRIC/CRIN has been debunked”, well the WT:CRIC discussion goes dead at the end of July (save for Lugnuts working on notable competitions) and the one at WT:NSPORT is ongoing, so no, nothing has been debunked, the discussion is, as you said, ongoing. StickyWicket (talk) 19:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The consensus of the discussions (and outcomes of the AfDs) are clear, which is why discussion has moved on to the detail of rewriting the guidelines, removing the "one-match" criteria. wjematherplease leave a message... 20:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.