Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Pitylak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 05:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Ryan Pitylak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP1E, other not notable promotional content has been reinserted about Unique Influence Jppcap (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I had no difficulty finding multiple WP:RS sources on this guy on the first two pages of hits from a Google search. His background may be unsavory, but it clearly meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO. And I am just not seeing this as a promotional article. Reference to his current doings would seem reasonable in a BLP. And that reference is pretty matter of fact to my reading. I have occasionally been accused of being too quick to pull the trigger on suspected SPAM articles. But this just doesn't look like a promo article to me. It's short and to the point, just the facts thank you very much. And as already mentioned the subject is clearly notable. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep When the Associated Press calls a person "One of the world's most notorious spammers" and other reliable sources describe him in similar terms, that amounts to notability. A multi-year spam campaign is not "one event". There is nothing promotional about the current version of the article, and if anything promotional is added, it can be corrected by normal editing.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  07:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.