Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Prescott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 07:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Ryan Prescott

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no evidence that this person meets WP:GNG, WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. None of the cited references provided even mention him. Note that the article about the band of which he was allegedly a member has also been nominated for deletion (see Articles for deletion/Diverse). If anything, this appears to be a WP:COATRACK article related to Rocket Records and its founder, and attempts to make an assertion of notability through association with other boy bands of that era. Kinu t/c 07:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The above comment mirrors my thoughts. In fact, I made a comment on the Diverse AfD discussion putting forth the same argument as I make here. I found nothing about this person on an internet search. If someone can find notable coverage on the internet or in print media, I would consider changing my vote. Bill Pollard (talk) 12:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  16:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable.  One of many articles created and crosslinked in an attempt to create notability.   PeterWesco (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I originally authored the article in good faith and I will now say DELETE because the article has caused a small uproar here over notability. Consensus seems to be delete this article, which I will even agree with based on valid points raised, with the exception on PeterWesco's notion that it was created to garner notability which is completely untrue. I always respect community consensus, even on articles I have contributed directly or worked on a lot. I contributed a historic-based article with the limited references available for WikiProject Music, but if consensus is that this article fails to meet notability, than I respect that.    Zachtron (talk) 03:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.