Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Scott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Ryan Scott

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BLP, lack of secondary sources; full of external links which can be considered as WP:SPAM; the only (disputable) notability reason may be related to the reference of opt-in method invention, but simple web-search reveals Ryan Scott Druckenmiller, not Ryan Scott. Mserge (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Plenty of 'sources', but very few reliable ones; and those that are have virtually no mention of Ryan Scott himself. NetCreations may be marginally notable, but Mr. Scott certainly is not. Terraxos (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Former name was Ryan Scott Druckenmiller.  Search using former name provides innumerable reliable sources. Notability is subjective.   LevyM (talk) 19:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: How about tagging cleanup/nofootnotes/notability, waiting 2-3 months and re-listing if nothing happens? -- Lea (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree with above. This is a borderline case — he might be notable, though this looks a bit like vanispamcruft. Links from Busines Wire are often suspect, since that is merely a "wire service" that distribute press releases, so they are often primary sources. Fix it, then let's revisit the issue. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 05:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. The page contains 24 external sources of which only 5 mention the subject. Of these, no sources can be used to confirm notability of the subject's biography. 89.252.27.234 (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.