Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Sultan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Ryan Sultan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't see any evidence that the subject passes WP:NPROF or GNG. Assistant professors are rarely notable and this doesn't seem to be an exception - his most highly cited paper has 65 citations, which is far from satisfying WP:NPROF, especially in a high-citation field. The citations in the article comprise primary sources, his own works, and news items in which he provides a quote in passing - there's no independent biographical coverage of the subject himself. The article appears to have been the subject of extensive COI/UPE editing, which wouldn't be a reason to delete it if it were actually notable, but which furthers the impression that the topic doesn't meet our standards for inclusion. Spicy (talk) 21:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Psychiatry, Venezuela,  and United States of America. Spicy (talk) 21:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly not a WP:NPROF pass and I don't see WP:GNG coverage either. -- asilvering (talk) 22:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with everything the nominator says: we do not have a pass of WP:PROF based on citations or anything else, nor any reason for a separate pass of WP:GNG, and the editing history is also problematic. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't pass WP:NPROF or GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 12:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPROF and GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.