Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Wang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Ryan Wang

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet criteria for notability Avidreaderofbuuks (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Ryan Wang
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  16:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete an unsourced biography of a living person who in no way meets our notability criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I just did a basic google news search and found articles covering Wang over the span of 5 years. I have cleaned up the article a little bit using some of the sources, but it could use some more work. The subject seems to easily meet WP:BASIC and coverage over 5 years shows it's not just a BLP1E situation for Carnegie Hall/Ellen. Samsmachado (talk) 23:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I would like to point out that the nominator's only contributions to Wikipedia have been to nominate this article for deletion. The nominator does not appear to have done their WP:BEFORE check nor does the nomination cite a specific rationale/policy for deletion. Samsmachado (talk) 01:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that have been added to the article such as The Straits Times and CBC and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: the coverage of his performances shows notability. Article is appropriately sourced and scoped.  // Timothy ::  talk  17:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.