Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Wooley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Ryan Wooley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

this page is about me and has a lot of inaccurate information. It also appears that it hasn't been updated in close to five years. I don't feel I need a wikipedia account, nor know why one was created and never maintained. SportsFan730 (talk) 17:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Creating deletion discussion for Ryan Wooley
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 16.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete News coverage quotes the subject but is not about the subject; no pressing concerns override WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Strictly speaking, Wikipedia does not require an article subject's permission before we can start or maintain an article about them, but neither the sourcing nor the substance on offer here suggest a reason why an article was actually warranted — this is referenced entirely to primary sources and YouTube videos, with no evidence of reliable source coverage about him shown at all, and being a local radio personality in a single media market is not an automatic notability pass in the absence of quality sourcing. And while I don't know enough about Ryan's career to assess what's accurate and what isn't, that's precisely why we insist on reliable source coverage as the notability test. So WP:BIODEL applies here: he's not nationally prominent enough or reliably sourceable enough for us to overrule his request for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete We don't have to delete the article on request if consensus is the subject is notable, and in fact we shouldn't. But I've seen nothing to indicate this subject is, in fact, notable. And that's really what matters here. 19:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.