Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rydale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Rydale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable clothing company. Near-G11 WP:PROMO, containing nothing of value to anyone other than potential customers. No third-party independent sources - only their own site. Note searches for just 'Rydale' bring up the place in Yorkshire, not the firm. No depth or persistence of coverage; fails WP:ORGCRITE specifically and WP:GNG more broadly. Redirection is of course an option but note that the page author has already undone a previous redirect. &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  15:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable company lacking any coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 18:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Aside from mention in the title of a sponsored showjumping event, a Rydale Clothing International Spectacular, which is insufficient for notability, I am finding nothing to indicate that this firm is notable, whether by WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. (Note that there are similarly named printing and car trading firms.) Regarding the previous redirect, the Yorkshire_Trading_Company section looks misplaced, unless there are formal links between the two firms other than as a retail outlet; the encyclopaedia may be better without both the section and the redirect. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Poor, unreferenced article on non-notable company. The place is far more significant.Wilus (talk) 09:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.