Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryderwear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Missed these two. SK4, nom is a sock, etc. Haven't actually read it so NPASR and all that. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Ryderwear

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable company with routine paid posts, poor sourcing. SmartCompany articles posted somewhere else then resposted. Forbes Former contributor article (non-WP:RS), others are press releases. Konhume (talk) 18:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Companies, Fashion,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.