Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryoma Ito


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Ryoma Ito

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources establishing notability. Having searches 50 pages of google, I cannot find a single thing about him other than the games he has worked on. He appears to have no individual encyclopedic notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - When googling his name and "final fantasy" in Japanese, there appears to be a ton of information relating to him. I would call this a borderline notoriety case.  Someone fluent in Japanese would need to review the websites referring to him, parse out the relevant materials and update the page.  Even then, I suspect this a borderline case. Kabirat (talk) 12:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I did that same google search, but there was nothing on any non-wiki page in the first five pages of results that said anything more than "Ryoma Ito did the illustrations for this" or "Character design by Ryoma Ito"- nothing, in other words, beyond what you would find in the credits at the end of a game. -- Pres N  00:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from his character design works. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. In the absence of third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage, sufficient notability has not been demonstrated. --DAJF (talk) 01:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.