Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryton Woodside


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 00:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Ryton Woodside

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources to show notability Finnegas (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Occupied settlements are considered notable, and I have added a reference describing this "straggling hamlet" in the 19th century.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  01:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the source provided in the article by User:Cullen328 and per WP:GEOLAND. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:47, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added two more sources describing the modern situation.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  02:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Officially recognized populated geographic location. WP:NGEO and WP:NPLACE. Mkdw talk 09:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.