Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryu Goto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (and tagged for sourcing) - Non-admin closure. D.M.N. (talk) 17:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ryu Goto

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

This page appears to be self promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YukioTakahashi (talk • contribs) 2008/01/10 07:03:24
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I don't know what the evidence is that the article is self promotional, and that in itself isn't a justification for deleting it as in this case a Google search reveals that the subject enjoys some notability, including a warm review in the Washington Post. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep While there does seem to be some self-promotion it doesn't seem blatant enough to require deletion.  VivioFa teFan   (Talk, Sandbox) 14:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 15:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I confess I'm not seeing much that's self-promotional, and in any case, as long as the subject's notable that's not a valid reason to delete but rather clean up. As AlasdairGreen27 notes, it's fairly easy to find evidence of this prodigy's notability. Keep and tag for sourcing. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep A significant review in a major source is sufficient. DGG (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.