Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryuki Matsuya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Ryuki Matsuya

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is essentially the same case as Articles for deletion/Shun Sato (footballer, born 1990), only this footballers played 4 league games for the same club, not 1 game. At least 70 AFD discussions (with more being added every week) say that this is not enough because of the WP:GNG fail. Geschichte (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  09:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - clear consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when GNG is failed. Looking at Soccerway each of his appearances appears to have been for 2-3 minutes per match. GiantSnowman 11:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't figure out what the Japanese version of his name is as there appear to be different translations for both of his names. For English coverage at least (which is the main language for Singapore football news), there is nothing to suggest that he can pass GNG, which is hardly surprising considering that he has only played 8 12 mins of professional sport. Spiderone  13:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - This needs a lot better sourcing before it can be proven that it can be a full-fledged article.Katemeshi101 (talk) 21:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. -Cupper52 (talk) 08:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.