Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/São Tomé and Príncipe–Turkey relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

São Tomé and Príncipe–Turkey relations

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. There really is not much to these relations. There's a small historical interaction. No embassies, agreements, state visits. Level of trade is very small. The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs doesn't say much LibStar (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to be pretty much a non-subject. Two of the four sources cited are the same web page, which mainly says that neither country has an ambassador for the other. Maproom (talk) 23:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no indication that relations between these two countries are anything special or warranting a dedicated article. If anything the lengthy list of external sources suggests a stronger connection between Portugal and Sao Tome and Principe - I don't see Turkey mentioned in the titles. The treaties mentioned in the article were signed between dozens of countries, and the treaty articles don't highlight anything specifically about Turkey and Sao Tome and Principe, so no special sign of notability. The Jewish diaspora to the Ottoman Empire during the Inquisition could be mentioned in other articles, if necessary. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  23:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tim Templeton. Mccapra (talk) 05:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Another one of these articles with no content for a non existent relationship. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:36, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.