Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sävsjömålet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Sävsjömålet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not in English, but from Google Translate, this appears to be a game report of a football bandy match. Not exactly something that needs an article considering it only appeared to be a regular league match rather than, say, a cup final or something like that. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:35, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Today the same article was deleted from Swedish Wikipedia three times. Largoplazo (talk) 11:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to be a web developer (based on the page targeted by the link given in the article) bragging about his own performance during a local amateur bandy club match. Largoplazo (talk) 11:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SNOWBALL. Totally non-notable goal by non-notable person. Appears to be created as WP:LINKSPAM. Sjö (talk) 14:16, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A non-notable event from a local floorball match in the 90's and POV all the way, carries no encyclopedic value. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly non-notable. Would be opposed to speedy as virtually every sporting match has some claim to significance, even if in the vast majority of cases it's not enough for an article. They generally only receive routine coverage unless something out of the ordinary happens, but even routine coverage is enough to block a speedy. Smartyllama (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: as obvious spam. Advise salting because of the history of recreation on the Swedish Wikipedia. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:45, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not relevant, and it doesn't seem like the extravagant claims would be verifiable. /Julle (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and wish we could have moved it to WP:DRAFT space or somewhere instead of forcing getting like 8 people to waste time on it. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.