Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sønderborg railway station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Sønderborg railway station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't seem to be notable enough. Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello ) 23:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. This has a much more developed article on the Danish Wikipedia, and I'd be astounded if a 120-year-old railway station in a significant European city didn't have lots of sources available for it. I would be surprised though if the majority of those sources were in English. Thryduulf (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep the rationale here is rather weak and doesn't explain why the article doesn't seem notable or what WP:BEFORE was carried out. A station that has been rebuilt twice will have had coverage of the reconstruction in local press and thus will be notable. Garuda3 (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: the Danish article is longer, but contains no sources. Not voting delete because I haven't done further digging, but I don't think keep is the right outcome here unless sources are found. -- asilvering (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per Thryduulf and Garuda3. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.