Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Süt Kardeşler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Süt Kardeşler

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NFILM Donald D23   talk to me  00:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Turkey.  Donald D23   talk to me  00:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Note that multiple English language obituaries for Kemal Sunal note this film as "popular", eg, listing it first among comedies "cementing Sunal's place in the film history". To have such a mention in such a famous actor's obituary a strong pointer that sources NEXIST. For the moment, we have:
 * via tr:Süt Kardeşler, 110+ words of SIGCOV.
 * This book seems to have a large amount of SIGCOV: Kemal Sunal filmlerinde folklor ve mizah
 * Here's an academic book published 38 years after contextualizing the film with some short bug significant coverage Sensational Religion: Sensory Cultures in Material Practice
 * This seems promising Çeviribilimde Güncel Tartışmalardan Kavramsal Sorgulamalara
 * Given the era and language, based on what I've found so far, I'm confident this meets WP:GNG. &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. The sources provided by Siroxo show notability. Thank you!- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  09:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep — Pretty much impossible for a movie with this cast to be non-notable. In addition to above, there are a couple of journal articles with a section about the movie:, . It was reportedly the third-highest rated Turkish movie ever on IMDb. Keep in mind that most of the sourcing discovered in this discussion is from decades after release. Styyx (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The mere fact that I recognize the title suggests to me that the film is likely notable, and a quick search for sources appears to bear this out. I expect that Turkish-language sources (possibly only available offline) could be used to write a fairly extensive article. TompaDompa (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The two refs appear to be from reliable and independent journals that pass SIGCOV with three fairly long paragraphs on this film. Ref 2  linked appear to cover this film across multiple pages and probably (though I am not completely sure due to the paywall and language barrier) count towards GNG. I would say that this, which only mentions the film twice, would not meet significant coverage, though the page is paywalled so I am not entirely confident on whether or not it meets SIGCOV. Still, the three sources already are enough for a GNG pass.  VickKiang   (talk)  07:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.