Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.K.H. Tseung Kwan O Kei Tak Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui. content under the re-direct for the merge to be performed. This has been open for two weeks with no one contesting a merge. The content is not being deleted and continued AfD is not required for mergers. StarM 02:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

S.K.H. Tseung Kwan O Kei Tak Primary School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable primary (grade) school - fails WP:N. Usual practice is to redirect to article on school district, but in this case there is no school district article to be a redirect target. ukexpat (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  -- ukexpat (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- ukexpat (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Tseung Kwan O . There is sourced, mergeable content and this is normal practice for primary schools outside North America. TerriersFan (talk) 16:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment the relevant section of the parent organisation, Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui (whence the "S.K.H.") is probably a more appropriate merge target. Randomly merging content to traditionally-recognised placenames which don't reflect actual administrative divisions will produce very confusing results. cab (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have no problem with a merge to Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui. TerriersFan (talk) 02:06, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.