Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.M.K. Sultan Abdul Samad, Petaling Jaya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. James086 Talk &#124; Email 12:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

S.M.K. Sultan Abdul Samad, Petaling Jaya

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I have cleaned up this article, but no real reasons for this school being notable are given and I therefore propose it to be deleted. Crusio (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn. --Crusio 17:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have put a reference in the article which shows some notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment that's rather minimal and not really independent. IS there anything better to show notability? --Crusio 02:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. I'm usually very reluctant to use ghits as an argument for notability, but in this case I will. Considering that high schools are usually accepted as notable purely by virtue of their existence, I would have thought that for a high school in Malaysia to get these ghits would imply pretty strong notability. Phil Bridger 08:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Many of those Ghits don't seem to be about this school. If one ads "school" to the Google search, much fewer hits result. But that's rather academic now, as I am withdrawing the nomination. --Crusio 17:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   —Phil Bridger 08:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant high school. The page needs expansion but the sources available show that there is plenty of material to do this. TerriersFan 16:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Thanks TerriersFan, the article looks better now and I am withdrawing the nomination. --Crusio 17:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, article is reasonably well-written and appears to be rather notable. Thanks for the rework, TerriersFan! CRGreathouse (t | c) 23:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.