Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.S. Tidal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  Marasmusine (talk) 11:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

S.S. Tidal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Another game guide for a non-notable Pokemon level. Would not be a likely redirect. Greedyhalibut (talk) 04:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article fails to provide sufficient context for inclusion. If it's indeed a level in a game, then it's not suitable for inclusion anyway. - Mgm|(talk) 09:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article barely even establishes context - if the nominator hadn't been nice enough to refer to it as a level I would have been none the wiser. Even if the current problems with the article's style and content were rectified, I very much doubt sufficient independent, reliable-source coverage could be found to produce an encyclopedic, verifiable article. Individual levels in games have to be pretty spectacularly unique to receive enough coverage for the notability threshold by themselves. ~ mazca  t 10:44, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 17:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, comes close to a game guide if it isn't anyway.  Elm-39 - T/C/N 18:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:GAMEGUIDE, WP:OR, no assertion of notability, etc. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hey, you guys took my reasoning! -sesuPRIME talk • contribs 06:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.