Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. C. Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

S. C. Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable biography that is written like a resume than an actual BLP. It fails GNG as it is not written from a neutral point of view. For instance, "He has been distinguished invitees, Chief Guest, Guest of honor in various universities", "He has guided many Ph.D.'s. He has participated and organized many seminars and conferences." The article doesn't use independent sources as they all come from the schools this person works at or has spoken at in seminars and conferences. Notability is clearly not presented. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:44, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Relevant criteria to check here would be WP:Academic. If it would have qualified that, GNG doesn't need to be satisfied. But, he doesn't seem to fulfil any WP:Academic criterias either. His positions are not highest level administrative and I can't locate his GS profile to check if his work is highly cited in his field. If someone can prove otherwise, happy to change my vote. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the research articles cited in the article are not even from the same person: "Sharma, Prof Satish Chander" and "Sharma, Baldev R (1993)" and a book chapter? Fails WP:NPROF#1 clearly. None of the "Satish C. Sharma" in Microsoft Academic even match this person. --hroest 03:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't fail GNG because of it's tone - WP:DINC. That being said, it does fail WP:GNG and WP:NPROF nonetheless. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Absolutely zero reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:56, 15 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.