Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. G. Collins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

S. G. Collins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable BLP; obvious COI; strictly promotional / resume; resources are primary and linked to subject; no substantial reason for inclusion found within WP guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maineartists (talk • contribs) 12:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Writer who has had some articles published but who has not attracted much attention, certainly not enough to pass WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG.  Has written several books, all or most of which were self-published, and none of which appear to have been review or otherwise written about. The sole instance of significant attention being taken of this writer is a couple of articles that mention an article he wrote on why the moon landing photos could not have been fakes, and it is not enough.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.