Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. R. H. James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

S. R. H. James

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable. Referenced directly to the subjects website. He's part author of a series of Latin textbooks. Also apparently created a book on London Film locations. None of which appear to be particularly notable. Caffeyw (talk) 10:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Though one can become notable writing widely used textbooks, there is no indication this his book is one of them, nor does the other book appear to be notable.  DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur with nominator's analysis. Being a schoolteacher who writes textbooks does not confer notability. Finnegas (talk) 17:24, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- With Latin as a subject that is less and less taught, I find it hard to accept that the authro of a new text book on it is notable for that. This artticle reads like a fan-article by one of his pupils.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.