Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Scott Conner (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G4. Also salted for three months considering how recent the last AfD is. T. Canens (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

S. Scott Conner
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Clear puff piece for a local radio and TV host Bihco (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Userfy or Delete WP:notability is a possibility, but this article miserably fails at establishing it and at covering the subject in an encyclopedic manner.  I made a quick scan of the "references".  11 of them just list "S. Scott Conner" as the reference!   In a quick scan I did not spot any that appear to be rs's suitable for establishing wp:notability.   The wording is 100% peacock/promotional, so the only way to fix the wording would be to delete it and start over. North8000 (talk) 11:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 12:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 12:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete – per G4 given the fact it was deleted via AfD only two weeks ago. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 12:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup, G4 applies, and even if notability could be established this still needs to be nuked from orbit so we can start over. There's no NPOV version in the history to revert to.— S Marshall  T/C 12:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.