Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S/he


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun. --Core des at 20:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

S/he
Incomplete nomination by. The reason given on the talk page was: "Listed as for deletion as there are no references and this term is nothing but an incorrect use of a slash to indicate alternation. Correctly it should be he/she, she/he.  A case could be made for s'/he but it would be very weak." --Mr. Lefty (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. --- RockMFR 01:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun. --Daniel Olsen 01:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I use "it" for an unknown third-person.--Patchouli 02:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun per above. Not strictly as dictated by WP:NOT but who cares? N Shar 03:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun per above. Smeelgova 04:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC).
 * Redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 09:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. MER-C 10:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per all above. It's a legitimate (or at least, a used) gender neutral pronoun, but not nearly enough info about it to merit its own article. GassyGuy 10:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. This is inaccurate above all else; I've seen s/he used without a whiff of activism by "genderqueers" (who makes up these words?) or anyone else, out of simple convenience. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun per above. --Lim e tom 01:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gender-neutral pronoun - I've seen this usage frequently enough, but not frequently enough to net an article when the gender-neutral pronoun article clearly suffices. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.