Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S4U


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

S4U

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BAND and WP:MUSICBIO. No entries Discogs, Spotify nor Napster. Only 289 listeners on Soundcloud. Simply not notable. scope_creep (talk) 20:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 21:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Triptothecottage (talk) 21:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment S4U do have a presence on Spotify, here's their EP on the service. Furthermore, SoundCloud streams aren't a good gauge of importance nor notability because some bands point to it more than others, you can be utterly non-notable with tens of thousands or concrete notable with ten. Reliable sources for bands would be newspapers, books, established magazines and websites, national radio and television coverage, and so on. KaisaL (talk) 04:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOTNOW. Despite my comment above, I don't think S4U meet the threshold yet, but that could change within years, maybe even months. The initially coverage at The 405 and Noisey is promising, and they also premiered a song at Clash Magazine. However, this is common for countless new bands and the coverage isn't sustained nor exactly lead material. Also, the article creator Lucian Tackle seems like a conflict of interest case because Google searches point me to Sälen, who are associated with S4U, and a Facebook account that's only a fan of S4U. Maybe management or a band member's alias, but either way there's likely some degree of that going on. KaisaL (talk) 04:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.