Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAGA (pop band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

SAGA (pop band)
Thank you for advice, I will refresh page with more detailed information and active links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagafan (talk • contribs) 16:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doing some copy editing here and the more I looked the fewer good refs that appeared to exist. I am no expert on Asian languages but those refs that I can translate and/or understand seem to give glancing refs or promises of great things yet to come. I can't see anything that hints at notability. Rather the whole thing hints at paid promotional editing to get a page here. Appears to fail WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 16:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best as none of the current coverage seems sufficiently convincing, unless better Japanese coverage can be found. SwisterTwister   talk  05:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:20, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Noen of the links establish that the group is notable.Peachywink (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence this passes WP:BAND. sst✈discuss 11:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.