Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAMIZDATamerica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. - Gl e n 15:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

SAMIZDATamerica
Blogs, especially political ones, are a dime a dozen. I don't see what makes this particular one notable. Full disclosure: I prodded this for much the same reason and the tag was removed by the editor with nothing else added. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Samizdatamerica.com" gets exactly ZERO ghits. You can't be much more nn than that. --Aaron 00:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB and WP:ADS. Has no alexa ranking -- TBC TaLk?!? 00:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable blog. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 07:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable blog. J I P  | Talk 08:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 08:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if the subject was notable then the article wouldn't be as rubbish as it is. Cynical 09:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable blog. Ramsquire 19:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no content to this "article," it appears to exist only to promote a non-notable political blog, which is in direct violation of Wikipedia rules. -JakeApple 06:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per above. - Pernambuco 19:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.