Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAO Clan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

SAO Clan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable gaming clan. Deleted through prod, but re-instated. Hairhorn (talk) 22:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC) *Axe it - Can't find significant coverage, let alone reliable coverage. --Teancum (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - updated my vote based on Marasmusine's findings on the article author. --Teancum (talk) 12:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy Delete please! See comment per Marasmusine below. This article got a PROD soon after creation and was deleted without incident. For a good laugh, please read this request for an undelete, which was granted. Nothing has happened since. Need a Wikipedia shortcut for these things, since this reeks of WP:GARAGE, but for gaming. I'm not really going to be able to go with the one source listed as RS or establishing notability. Since this was already deleted uncontested via PROD and hasn't been improved after undelete despite the creater saying they would, this isn't a terribly difficult call. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datheisen (talk • contribs) 04:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - an A7 or G11 speedy is viable here: note that the article's creator is the "owner and operator" of SOA . Marasmusine (talk) 10:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh my. I never cease to be impressed at how well you do your homework on every article regardless of how direct it might appear and can obviously search better than I can :) ...Changing to speedy delete and... changed above. Thanks for finding that. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 21:37, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete I can't believe the amount of obvious stuff that even makes it to AFD - seriously this should all be handled by the CSD process and re-creation for this obvious stuff should be blocked. -Drdisque (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It passed speedy the first time, it took a prod to get rid of it. Hairhorn (talk) 22:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.