Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAP Fiori


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Only two keep votes, but both of them provide many sources to prove the subject's notability. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

SAP Fiori

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable software which lacks coverage in reliable sources. A search only results in affiliated websites, promotional material, and press releases. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect - to List of SAP products. Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Refs provided are a blog and company PR, not WP:RS. Redirect to parent company product list as the company is certainly notable.Dialectric (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – This seems to be the new user interface for SAP apps. Which is a big deal if you are a user or developer, as SAP is the world's leading business app vendor. There was enough third-party coverage to tell what it is: And a controversy over whether it should be free... that seems to have been settled recently (it will be free). So enough to write about. – Margin1522 (talk) 11:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Source examples include:, , (pp. 134-136),  (pp 62-63),  (pp. 19-20). See also WP:BEFORE, section D. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.