Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS Daniels LLP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. As noted, the references do not establish notability. -Splash - tk 22:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

SAS Daniels LLP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article seems purely promotional and has no references to establish notability. The article also contains multiple links to the subjects organization's web site. - MrX (TALK) 02:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I made explicit the 3 references that were lurking as links from the article text. Aside from that, I can find one passing mention] in The Guardian. However although one ref does describe the subject as an "ambitious law firm", this feels like a local firm getting on with its own business, and no clear notability. AllyD (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, was easily able to find many sources in simple use of . &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. While there is a secondary source which discusses the firm (here), I can't find any sources which go to the notability of the firm itself. I see many sites that appear to redirect back to their main website (or lead to some video/article written by them), so I'm not sure we have reliable sources here. Lord Roem (talk) 04:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.